Was over reading a pretty impressive essay at Vanderleun's American Digest, and in the comments there is one from Allah, using Allahpundit's email address. According to the comment, Allah (if he is indeed the Allahpundit) has quit. I quote from "Allah's" comments, below.
Interesting post, Gerard. The reason I quit blogging was because it was no longer fun enough to be a hobby and never had been lucrative enough to be a job. Your post, I think, presages that same Catch-22 on a vast scale: As the medium becomes more "active" and competitive, people who come to it wanting nothing more than a place to spout off in their spare time will face an expectation that they should be out on the street digging up stories. Some of them will ignore that expectation, content to spout off into the void while the medium leaves them behind. Some of them will adapt and discover that they have a knack for newshounding. I expect the average joe, though, will toil away at it for awhile with mounting frustration until one day it occurs to him that if he had wanted to be a f**king journalist, he would have been a journalist. That's when he'll shut down his computer and go get himself a hobby that actually reduces his stress. Imagine this happening en masse and "The Great Consolidation" starts to look more like "The Great Weeding Out."
I'm not sure I agree with Allah's point here. I don't blog because I want to be a journalist. I blog because it amuses me. Believe me, if I thought someday I was going to wake up and realize "I don't want to be a journalist" I wouldn't blog at all. Who the hell ever wanted to be a journalist in the first place?
I guess that means I fall into Allah's category of "those that the medium leaves behind."
Yeah? Says who? If Allah, or Glenn Reynolds (for sake of argument) decides that blogging is journalism, does that make it so? Who defines the medium that's "leaving me behind?" I mean, if I want to post Friday night pictures of my cat, is a big blogger going to tell me that I'm not blogging?
I think that the blogosphere is an exercise in vanity, and not much more. Always has been. Always will. The fact that it is destructive of journalism just shows you that journalism, as practiced today, is something worse than vanity.
Mere journalism ain't something we should aspire to.
I do not think the blogosphere will replace the news media. I do think it will, by pointing out their excesses and incompetencies, make the news media get better.
But who cares about them, anyway? It isn't about journalism. It never was. It's about posting pictures of your cat on Friday night, among other things.
UPDATE: Arthur Chrenkoff has linked to this post. Welcome, Chrenkoff fans. I have additional comments (or as they say on C-Span, I have revised and extended my remarks) here.